TP-Link v Huawei [2026] EWHC 179 (Pat)
Edward acted for Huawei in this dispute on interim licence terms. The dispute is notable for being the first occasion on which two companies consensually sought determination of interim licence terms by the English Courts.
Huawei succeeded in persuading the Court that it was right to continue to adopt the mid-point approach to interim licence valuation, and that TP-Link’s offer could not be used to define the lower end of that range because that offer did not involve payment for past sales or interest. The court held that TP-Link had not articulated a sufficiently persuasive case as to why the Court in this case might depart from the principles regarding past sales and interest in Interdigital v Lenovo.